Business and shareholding
Owner or co-owner of a German business, limited partner with more than 25 percent of the income, or a shareholding within section 17 EStG in a German corporation.
Deregistering does not finish the job. If you move to a low-tax country and keep substantial economic interests in Germany, the extended limited tax liability of section 2 of the Foreign Tax Act (AStG) can continue for ten years. This is the test, step by step, with sources.
Extended limited tax liability means that Germany keeps taxing income beyond the ordinary limited tax liability of section 49 EStG. It covers income that would not be foreign income under section 34d EStG if you were fully taxable. Section 2 AStG requires all of the following:
The period runs from the year in which full tax liability ends to the end of ten years after that year. The tax administration describes it as the year of departure and the following ten years. Sources: section 2 AStG, ministry circular of 22 December 2023, IV B 5 - S 1340/23/10001 :001, paras. 4, 14 to 17, 20 to 22.
The statute has no country list. Section 2(2) AStG contains two alternative tests:
Rebuttal: in both cases the presumption of low taxation falls away if you prove that your total taxes on your income reach at least two thirds of the German income tax that would apply under full tax liability. You carry the burden of proof (circular, paras. 23 to 26).
The figure 25 percent does appear in section 2 AStG, but elsewhere: a limited partner has substantial economic interests if more than 25 percent of the income from the partnership is attributable to them. It is neither a tax rate nor a share of capital. Anyone who shortens the test to "below 25 percent" is testing the wrong thing.
The three groups in section 2(3) AStG are alternatives. One is enough:
Owner or co-owner of a German business, limited partner with more than 25 percent of the income, or a shareholding within section 17 EStG in a German corporation.
Income that is not foreign income exceeds 30 percent of total income or 62,000 euro in the tax year.
Assets whose yield would not be foreign income exceed 30 percent of total assets or 154,000 euro at the start of the tax year.
This is where 1 January matters: the business and asset features are tested at the start of the tax year, the income test of no. 2 for the whole year. According to the administration, tax-exempt income and assets are generally left out. Source: circular of 22 December 2023, paras. 27 to 30.
Simply holding. Holding produces no income, so holding alone does not trigger section 2 AStG. It can enter the asset test on 1 January. Whether crypto counts there is unsettled: the administration generally leaves tax-exempt assets out, and gains on crypto after the one-year holding period are tax-free. We advise not to rely on this but to include the holdings in the test.
Selling. A private gain under section 23 EStG is not German-source income under section 49 EStG. Ordinary limited tax liability therefore does not apply merely because a wallet or exchange is located in Germany. Section 2 AStG goes further: it also catches income that does not count as foreign under section 34d EStG. Under section 34d no. 8 (b) EStG, gains from private disposals are foreign if the assets sold are located in a foreign state. There is no situs rule for decentralised crypto, and a wallet or custodian is, on the sources we reviewed, not a connecting factor. If foreign situs cannot be established, the wording does not rule out that the gain falls under section 2 AStG when the other conditions are met.
The positions in the literature. As our book sets out (fn. 43), one view assigns the on-chain holding to the state of residence. That would make it foreign income, which section 2 AStG does not catch. Another view finds no clear foreign connection, and a third leans towards the state-of-residence position. None of these views has been confirmed by the highest court. We set the positions side by side and do not decide the question here.
There is no ministry circular and no case law that deals with crypto assets expressly. The circular of 6 March 2025 contains no rule that treats crypto as German because of a German custodian or wallet. We treat the question as open. If you plan, allow for both outcomes. Before you move to a low-tax country, a sale inside the one-year period, ongoing income from staking and lending, and your holdings on 1 January should be reviewed separately. On the types of income: circular of 6 March 2025, BFH IX R 3/22.
If the holding period falls. Under the ministry's draft bill, newly acquired crypto assets would be taxed irrespective of the holding period (holding period article). That is not law yet. If it came, sales gains would regularly be taxable, and section 2 AStG would matter for more people who leave. In our reading, the draft does not provide for an exit tax on crypto assets.
Relief. Section 2(6) AStG caps the additional tax on proof, to the extent it would exceed the tax payable under full liability with a German home only. Capital income in the flat-rate regime of section 32d EStG is left out when the tax rate is computed.
Individuals in the United Arab Emirates pay no income tax. With a tariff of zero, the burden of the 77,000 euro comparison case is more than a third below the German one. The tariff comparison of section 2(2) no. 1 AStG is therefore met. General tax freedom is not a personal preferential regime under no. 2 (BFH IX R 37/21). The rebuttal stays available but rarely succeeds without substantial tax in the destination country.
In our research no tax treaty between Germany and the UAE has applied since 2022. A treaty barrier that could displace section 2 AStG is therefore missing (circular of 22 December 2023, para. 7). For a move to Dubai the real question is the other conditions: if you keep a home in Germany, you stay fully taxable anyway. If your interests in Germany are substantial, section 2 AStG continues.
Our subsidiary TII MAN GROUP FZCO supports clients in Dubai. We handle the German side. Moving to Dubai
In the German tax adviser exam in October 2026, a move with crypto assets to a low-tax country was tested, with Haiti as the destination. Answering "Haiti is a low-tax country" skips the test. This is how the subsumption works:
On Haiti itself, we know of no judgment and no current administrative circular that classifies the country as a low-tax territory for individuals. The repealed application circular of 14 May 2004 listed "Haiti, special zones" in an overview under low corporate tax burden or tax incentives (circular of 14 May 2004). Those were special zones, not a general personal income tax rate, and the circular no longer applies. The current circular of 22 December 2023 has no country list and requires an individual test; in case of doubt the Federal Central Tax Office can make findings. A conclusion that a move to Haiti equals low taxation is not supported.
Check whether the five-out-of-ten-years test is met. Periods of full tax liability are added up.
Run holdings, businesses, income and your assets on 1 January through the three groups.
The timing of a sale relative to your departure and to the one-year period decides whether income arises that section 2 AStG could catch at all.
Deregistration, giving up home and residence, a residence certificate from the destination country and tax evidence for the rebuttal.
Extended limited tax liability under section 2 AStG is a chapter in our book "Krypto-Steuern und Auswandern" (published 12 September 2026, in German), plus 18 country chapters, a departure timeline as checklist and three template letters. On Amazon · Leaving Germany