Miners and node operators
A trade beyond a certain scale, but often below the bookkeeping thresholds. Block rewards, transaction fees, electricity costs and hardware all come together here.
The cash-basis computation looks simpler than a balance sheet. With crypto it is not — because the central question, when purchased coins reduce the profit, has still not been conclusively resolved.
As long as no obligation to keep full books applies, it is available — and generally the better choice.
A trade beyond a certain scale, but often below the bookkeeping thresholds. Block rewards, transaction fees, electricity costs and hardware all come together here.
Anyone supplying services and paid in crypto assets has business income equal to the market value when it accrues — whether or not it is ever exchanged into euros.
The obligation to keep books arises only on exceeding the turnover or profit thresholds in section 141 AO, or on registration as a merchant. Until then the cash-basis computation suffices.
Whether your activity amounts to a trade at all is often unsettled. That is a separate assessment. Trade or private asset management
The cash-basis computation follows section 11 EStG: income is recorded when received, expenditure when paid. For crypto assets that has a consequence which is regularly overlooked.
A reward is received at the moment it is credited — valued at the price of that moment, not at the year-end price and not on the later sale. With daily distributions that produces several hundred valuations a year, each to be recorded individually.
The later sale is a separate event. If the price has fallen in the meantime, a loss arises against the value recorded on receipt; if it has risen, an additional gain. Collapsing the two produces a result that is wrong both as to timing and as to amount.
The central open question here — with a substantial effect on the profit of the year of acquisition.
Acquisition cost for crypto assets is said not to be deductible when paid, but only when the sale proceeds are received or the coins are withdrawn. In effect that treats crypto like securities and non-depreciable fixed assets.
The practical consequence: someone buying 200,000 euros' worth during the year and selling nothing reduces their profit by not a single cent.
Section 4(3) sentence 4 EStG contains a named list: non-depreciable fixed assets, shares in corporations, securities and comparable unsecuritised claims and rights, and land and buildings held as current assets. Crypto assets are not named in it.
For ordinary current assets — goods as much as gold bars — immediate deduction on payment remains the rule. Where crypto assets are held as current assets and are neither a claim nor a right, there is much to be said for treating them the same way.
This is our own legal view. It departs from the administrative position and has not, so far as we can see, been resolved by the highest court.
What this means for you: anyone wanting to raise the point should document the facts cleanly from the outset — the allocation to current assets, the intention of short-term disposal, and the payment dates. The assessment can then be kept open. The appeal procedure
Anyone considering immediate deduction needs to know this provision — it was created for exactly these constellations.
Section 15b EStG restricts the use of losses from tax deferral schemes: they may not be offset against other income, only against later profits from the same source. The loss is not lost — it is locked in time.
This subsection was introduced in response to arrangements that systematically generated losses through the immediate deduction of current assets in a cash-basis computation — the gold trading cases being the well-known example. It catches precisely the situation of a taxpayer not obliged to keep books acquiring current assets and thereby producing immediately deductible expenditure.
For crypto assets that means: achieving immediate deduction does not dispose of the section 15b question, it raises it. What decides is whether there is a scheme-like arrangement or an economically motivated transaction of the ongoing business.
Alongside this, the threshold in subsection 3 applies, under which the restriction bites only above a certain ratio of projected losses to capital employed. The two subsections have to be examined separately.
Our position on this: we do not build schemes. Where immediate deduction is in play, the point is the correct application of the statute to a business that actually exists — not a construct whose purpose is tax deferral. That distinction is also where an audit will start.
Unlike the coins, the operating assets follow the familiar rules — which makes the boundary easier to draw.
Computers, graphics cards and accessories are depreciable fixed assets written off over their useful life. Low-value assets may be deducted immediately. The asset schedule forms part of the Anlage EÜR form.
Where mining takes place in a private household, the business share must be established and evidenced — through a sub-meter or a traceable estimate. Without an apportionment the deduction will be cut in an audit, and generously so.
A room used for the business may be deductible; the conditions differ according to whether it is a home office within the meaning of the rules or a room used for business purposes.
Once the thresholds in section 141 AO are exceeded, a switch to a balance sheet is required. The transitional profit must be computed — and with crypto assets not previously deducted it can be substantial. Crypto accounting
The area of greatest uncertainty — and of the most expensive mistakes, because VAT can hardly be passed on retrospectively.
Exchanging legal tender for cryptocurrency is exempt on the case law of the European Court of Justice. That does not answer every question a business faces.
An NFT is not a single set of facts. What is sold is sometimes a digital work, sometimes a right of use, sometimes access to a community, sometimes a combination. That determines whether there is an electronically supplied service, where the place of supply lies, and whether the recipient is a taxable person — which with anonymous wallet addresses is rarely ascertainable.
These questions belong before the supply, not after it. Anyone who has made a taxable supply without accounting for VAT bears the tax economically — passing it on to anonymous buyers afterwards is impossible.